Dimi Payet; the Epilogue

1212224262779

Comments

  • Dimi doesn't want a move. He wants West Ham (IMO)
  • Dimi doesn't want a move. He wants West Ham (IMO)

    I certainly hope so ;thumbsup
  • Shows how smart the board were to give him a new contract.

    I think we have some canny people running the club...
  • 5 year contract on 125k per week, not many clubs will be willing to match that let alone beat it plus having to shell out on a sizeable transfer fee
  • But it only takes one........
  • Herb

    But if the club refuse to set a fee, no club can match it.

    Nothing to see here, move along to your next target.
  • Grey,

    I think you're over-simplifying. Yes, there are examples of players who have stayed despite wanting away, but there are many other factors to it.

    Once agents have spent a month establishing a rhetoric of 'Payet desperately wants to leave' in the tabloids, the issue becomes more complex.

    Yes, the club don't have to sell. But the club do have to weigh one thing against another to gauge what's in their best interest.

    If Payet isn't going to be himself and is generating negativity in the dressing-room, they will have to weigh keeping a potentially underperforming or unhappy Payet against bringing in vast amounts of money for a player approaching 30, the kind of money which could be spread across every position.

    So yes, the club doesn't ever have to sell, nor ever name a price. But it doesn't mean they won't sell if we reach a point where they believe they'd rather have huge swathes of money instead of a sulking 29 year old.

    (FYI, I don't think Payet is likely to sulk at all. But that's not to say agents and press won't whip up a rhetoric to say he is, which he might happily go along with because he knows deep down this would be his last chance to play for Madrid or PSG.

    And, as I mentioned, it's a situation which I don't think the owners would be totally against, as if they can lay all the blame on Payet, fans tend to be very understanding and they make a huge profit on him).
  • Jorderz

    Each to their onions.

    I think you are over-thinking it.

    Club isn't going to sell Payet.

    End of.
  • I hope you're right ;ok
  • This is in the online version of the Express:

    http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/680723/Chelsea-Dimitri-Payet-West-Ham-transfer-gossip-Premier-League

    I can only envy Charles Perrin getting paid for this kind of rubbish.
    Chelsea boost for Dimitri Payet: West Ham worried big club might snatch top star
    How is West Ham being 'worried' a boost for Chlesea?

    WEST HAM are reportedly growing increasingly concerned about keeping hold of Dimitri Payet.

    The attacking midfielder has been in sensational form for France at Euro 2016.

    The 29-year-old has found himself linked to Chelsea in recent weeks, as Antonio Conte seeks to revamp his squad.

    Atletico Madrid are also thought to be interested in the player, who has been slapped with a £60million price tag by West Ham.
    Except, he hasn't, as the club have pointedly refused to set a price.
    But according to the Daily Mirror, the Hammers are worried one of Europe’s big clubs will snatch their star man.
    What does the conjunction 'but' link to there? Nothing.
    However, it is believed they have no desire whatsoever to sell Payet.
    Er, so which is it?
    Arsene Wenger admitted earlier this week he tried to sign Payet.
    You'll like this bit...
    When pressed about the matter, he said: “Yes. Often. Very often, I have to say that I asked myself that question during my career.

    “And I also have to say that I decided against it because he was not consistent. I have never doubted that he had enough talent to play in my team.

    “I have been lucky enough in my club to always have very good players in his position and it was crowded!”
    So, Wenger actually said he had thought about signing Payet, and decided not to.

    There's a bloke getting paid cash money to read the work of other (?proper) journalists, and then getting his mish-mash of a story wrong in just about every respect.

    There is clearly no effort at editorial supervision, so next time you read an online story, even from a national newspaper, remember to keep plenty of salt to hand.
  • edited June 2016
    Imagine when we sell Payet for £80m, spending £30m of that on Christian Benteke won't seem so bad.
  • edited June 2016
    Jorderz - only issue with your hypothetical situation is that his agent has already spoken, and said this earlier this week:
    "As far as I am concerned, he's been happy at West Ham and it's down to West Ham that he's in the position that he is in."

    "He's doing great now for France and to get him now, you've got to be talking ridiculous money. But football is football, so you never know."
    http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/10313726/west-ham-midfielder-dimitri-payet-transfer-would-cost-ridiculous-money-says-agent

    Which suggests Payet is not looking to force a move, and that the ball is completely in WHU's court when it comes to his future.
  • I agree Lukerz, it would be the first time ever that an agent has turned out to be a lying weasel ;ok
  • Imagine when we sell Payet for £80m, spending £30m of that on Christian Benteke won't seem so bad.

    Sorry Luke, but there was no way u were gonna get away with that
    ;fishslap ;wink
  • Dimi is a hammer.
  • The problem is the owners will look like a laughing stock if they sell Dimi this summer after all their spiel about taking us to the next level through the Olympic Stadium move.

    You couldn't kick off a new era for the club in a more negative way than by selling Payet.

    This young man has it down right imo......

    Although I actually don't think anyone will bid mega bucks for Payet.
  • Imagine when we sell Payet for £80m, spending £30m of that on Christian Benteke won't seem so bad.

    lolz

    Really lit the fuse and ran there
  • And Ade on a free

    £50 mil in the bank

    #jobsagoodun

  • okay, think you've taken it a bit too far now

    ;fishslap
  • edited June 2016
    no its all good
    with the 50 large in the acc they might hand back those tenners for the ballot
    ;whistle
  • Problem with getting insane sums of money is that the money isn't usually reinvested wisely

    Look at Bale and Suarez, 2 mega mega deals, the type of money we will be looking for Payet and he's honestly as good as those palyers

    But look how hard liverpool & spurs messed up replacing him, blew the load on average players

    Keeping payet is much better than £60mil and I personally see him staying because I don't think the huge clubs are going to pay sooooo much money for a 29 year oldso here's hoping
  • Almost....

    image
  • Ladbrokes odds on Dimi to go this summer: -

    Chelsea 7/2
    Real Madrid 8/1
    PSG 9/1
    Manchester Utd 12/1
    Atletico Madrid 12/1
    Arsenal 16/1
    Bayern Munich 20/1
    Barcelona 20/1
    Juventus 20/1
    Olympique de Marseille 33/1
  • Lessons in French - 32

    The verb avoir Payet

    We've got Payet. - Nous avons Payet.

    Have we got Payet? - Avons-nous Payet?

    Who's got Payet? - Qui a Payet?

    Have they got Payet? - Ont-ils Payet?

    No, they haven't got Payet - Non, ils n'ont pas Payet.

    Who's got Payet? - Qui a Payet?

    We've got Payet. - Nous avons Payet.
  • passer, rien à voir ici
  • Its alright.

    Indykaila has just said we will sell Dimi and replace him with Jorden Henderson.

    Sleep easy.
  • Imagine when we sell Payet for £80m, spending £30m of that on Christian Benteke won't seem so bad.

    If we spend 30m on Benteke I'm rioting
  • Lessons in French - 32

    The verb avoir Payet

    We've got Payet. - Nous avons Payet.

    Have we got Payet? - Avons-nous Payet?

    Who's got Payet? - Qui a Payet?

    Have they got Payet? - Ont-ils Payet?

    No, they haven't got Payet - Non, ils n'ont pas Payet.

    Who's got Payet? - Qui a Payet?

    We've got Payet. - Nous avons Payet.

    I love this.

    So I have pinched this.
  • Has he gone yet?
Sign In or Register to comment.