We're not going to get a better keeper than Fabianski so we're either looking for a young keeper who can eventually replace him, an old keeper looking for somewhere to drift into retirement or a keeper with the patience of a Buddhist monk.
I see no benefit in letting him go out on loan, personally.
IMO, the pecking order of strikers should be Arnie, Hernandez, Perez, Carroll. If Arnie is out, I would rather has Perez as an option than Carroll, particularly given Carroll's injury history.
We've clearly budgeted for his wages for the season, so them taking him on loan and paying the wages doesn't really benefit us massively. If they took him on loan with a mandatory permanent deal at the end of the season for what we paid for him or more, then I'd do it. Otherwise, I think it's not worth it.
Comments
I've moved your pic and comment to the Wolves thread.
What could possibly go wrong.
Beat me to it IronHerb this is the sort signing that gives me hope we can progress young highly rated and knows where the goal is ;biggrin
Then tweeting then Drinkwater is unlikely.
Not sure really, we're relying on ITK snippets at the moment.
Problem is we need cover in all three positions.
I would take in order 1. Giroud 2. Cahill 3. Drinkwater but honestly all 3 would be a good short term solution
IMO, the pecking order of strikers should be Arnie, Hernandez, Perez, Carroll. If Arnie is out, I would rather has Perez as an option than Carroll, particularly given Carroll's injury history.
We've clearly budgeted for his wages for the season, so them taking him on loan and paying the wages doesn't really benefit us massively. If they took him on loan with a mandatory permanent deal at the end of the season for what we paid for him or more, then I'd do it. Otherwise, I think it's not worth it.
If we are replacing him with someone then sure, but otherwise I fear we will be short.