Board/Fan Relationship

1333436383952

Comments

  • edited March 2018
    I don't believe it, and will not do so unless convincing proof emerges.

    Any fool with a keyboard can put out anything they like on soshallow meejah.

    What I find bizarre is that, without any evidence, other people are prepared to believe whatever is written.
  • MrsGrey said:

    IronHerb said:

    Thing is Madcap if the donation aspect you state is true then RWHFAG could have stated this and stood down, after all the care of a sick child surpasses anything football, without losing too much/any face but they didn't.

    So, are you of the opinion it isn't true, because the RWHG didn't? Or that the RWHFG missed a trick and if they had stood down for that reason nobody would be too cross about it?

    I'm not sure what point you are trying to make (sorry) ;puzzled
    I didn't know at the time of writing, did you?

    I now believe the Club are matching the RWFAG contribution to the fund as it's been reported in minutes of Wednesdays meeting.
  • No.

    Thanks for clarifying.
  • Munich ;ok No need for apologies.

    Ironherb. I read the minutes/statement from RWHFAG before I posted, it`s where I got the info from. However, even though "in print" so to speak, I cannot prove, (as no-one can unless there in person), that what is said at meetings and documented is 100% gospel. Again IF what has been documented is true then I find the sentiment "call off the march and we will donate £20,000 to the Isla fund" reprehensible.

    I have also said in the past that although not particularly liking the board, I would much prefer them to a Russian oligarch (gangster) or Saudi oil thief. I have no particular axe to grind but (and perhaps this is just me) that snippet of info, the donation, is wrong on every level.

    I`m not a fan particularly of the Premier League and the vast sums of money involved. Money seems the answer to everything, and if money has been the answer to calling off the march, however good the cause, then I think I`ll stick to watching my daughters team on a Sunday.
  • I think there is confusion and at present and splintering because the politics was not got right, from what I can see the admin initially and throughout took a position of we are representing you, this is not about us but then took the biggest decision that there was on there own without consulting members, members who had offered money to fund the march and organisation itself.

    I have been following the similarities within the movement to a union and this is where the politics went wrong as they needed ballot, even if through nothing more than a facebook poll with regard their suggestion of calling off the march, after this was not done it was always going to work out badly.

    There is a lot of trust and big reputations among fans which is being questioned by many now. As communication is made I have no doubt the picture will become clearer but now the politics has been messed up the communication must be foot perfect.

    I will say the board have played a really good hand and I feel put the admin in a really difficult place by being so reasonable and accommodating that the admin had to either change their whole stance to we want the board out or do what has happened, go back to their large group of which some were attracted by the more extreme stance of board out arguably encouraged and fired up by themselves at times and say we are calling off the march.

    Could have done a few things
    1. Refuse to meet the board until after the march and state that the fans group wish to be heard and on a greater stage than a boardroom, but that we will sit down afterwards. This is then a show of strength and the march would have been big so would have focussed attention.
    2. Remove all personal responsibility by asking members whether they wish to march but attempt to persuade from within the group to a more reasonable position to side line the more extreme board out aspect.
    3. Change the narrative of the march by explaining we accept in good faith your promises and will now make the march a celebration of the west ham we seek together to bring to the new stadium, a new start etc etc. In other words a far better natured march but one that would no doubt serve to demonstrate strength.

    None are without difficulties and obstacles but were better in my view than the path taken.
  • Brady has played a blinder here.....she’s basically emotionally blackmailed them with the offer to match the Isla fund with a promise of no march.....

    They’ve been put in a difficult position but they’ve made their decision worse by not consulting their members first especially in light of one of their posts the other day essentially calling their members to march in numbers or don’t bother.

    Also they didn’t consistently reiterate that the march may not happen if the board open up to dialogue, which they have it would seem, another mistake.

    They’ve now got to hope Brady keeps to her word in order to get anywhere but the damage is already done, many within their group don’t trust them for one (unjustified) reason or another - expenses, trips, funding etc

    They’ve been boxed in, they should never of gone to sully a house and never of attended the short notice meeting they should’ve said were marching on the 10th regardless, if we see changes after that date to make the club better then we will think about not marching anymore. Take the buckets with you and raise the other £25k on your own for Isla

    Now you have them round a wobbly table and another group marching, it’s a mess

    Only at WHUFC
  • C&B ;ok

    I can understand them calling it off from the perspective of the issues they raised appear to have been addressed, or will be addressed, and the board are now actively engaged in meaningful dialogue, but to do it unilaterally without any form of consultation with either their own members or other groups is madness imo. As you say, there are far better courses of action they could have taken that would have kept the pressure up and indeed could have been celebratory. As far as the board is concerned, it would appear that they have played a blinder, but I think last nights events, plus the wording of the boards statement to encompass all groups, may actually create a backlash and harden the other groups resolve. The RWHFAG appear to have achieved a great deal in a short space of time and have at least got GSB to recognise that there may be problems for some fans, but they have also created a momentum that wasn`t there before and is hard to just switch off.
  • My biggest issue was that the purpose of the march was never communicated so one could never decide if the outcome was to be a success or not.
    The board used it's experience in negotiating by giving away things that were either easy to give away, flags with previous badges, or beyond their control, anything E20 related that can't be guaranteed.

    The march may still go ahead as: -
    @WHUISA2017 has publicly said this morning that they are still planning to protest and are in talks with the police today.
  • Why does everybody seem to believe that that is how it happened ie that Brady blackmailed them into calling off the march. Could it not be that the RWHFAG said they'd call off the march and donate the money raised to the Isla fund and the board said if you do that we will match it.
    It will probably transpire that those still intent on marching have absolutely no idea why they're marching but think it's a good idea.
  • I wasn’t thinking of joining the march,,, but I am now
  • Whichever groups now march, however, I would expect to be treated as hostile by the owners/board. The original march has been called off and there is dialogue going on. So to now say we are marching regardless goes to show that the marchers are not interested in dialogue but just want to cause friction.

    Whether this is true or not (although I expect there will be quite a few of those who are against anything offered) this is what I reckon the club's position will be. So good luck getting them to your table.
  • image

    May I ask why?
  • Yes,, I said “ I thinking about”

    1, freedom to join a March
    2, for any West Ham action group that, felt the need to give up there own time to demonstrate, which I agree with!
    3. Maybe to get public interest going.
    But in this case, I don’t like the way it’s been cancelled
  • This gets more bizarre by the minute. You don't like what the board do or say so supported the group and their aims but when they call off the march because they feel they've made progress you don't like that either. Or is it just that you like marching.
  • Ok then thorn 2 things
    Tell me why I shouldn’t march
    And secondly
    It may be against the people that think cancelling march is ok, I need more facts,,, but am angry,,, we shell see
  • There's no reason why you shouldn't march but because you can doesn't seem, to me, a valid reason.
    What exactly are those still marching actually marching for because I have absolutely no idea.
  • This is getting as fractious as Brexit, which is a shame.
  • Indeed thorn why
    I suspect againty the board, incoherent at most levels.
    Like I say, I was not interested in marching till now,,,
  • Just as an aside, weren't the club's finances due to made public yesterday? Or have I made that up? ;hmm
  • They are due anytime now.
  • What exactly are those still marching actually marching for because I have absolutely no idea.

    Regime change.

  • Do people really believe that a march will make DS and DG want to sell up?
  • Even if they could.
  • The ultimate plan of RWHFAG was to try and make the owners feel so uncomfortable that they would consider leaving, just like they did at BCFC, but they also knew that was slim to no chance of happening

    So they came up with their initial 5 point plan, and to be honest that should be achieved fairly quickly.....then I think it was to continue to sit down and go other items, keep the communication lines open
  • There has been some further communication today but no real explanation with regard the question of how such strong position that the march goes ahead and some pretty stern words against anyone who questioned it became changed so suddenly and without consultation with not only group members but even other groups who had come under the one banner.

    There was talk of people being bought off etc but I don't think that was the case for a second not just as I don't feel the people involved would have taken money but it would have been highly misjudged for the club to offer any financial incentive as the size of own goal it would have produced couldn't be over estimated if the group reps went back to the group and said they offered us money.

    I can understand the reflection that caused validity of the march to be questioned on account of the concessions made but not how it came about and feel there is more that will perhaps never be known.

    Sadly it was only a day before that hundreds and hundreds of founder member badges went out, there were wood engraved blocks and some poor fella has 20 engraved stone souvenirs that no one will want now, pretty soon having bought the RWHFAG memorabilia will feel like having bought a Betamax video recorder in 1978.

  • As an aside if the group is going to continue it will need a leader to step forward as a group remains but I cannot see a leader emerging. Bill Gardner has apparently said he is marching and would be a massive figurehead in the guise of those who have stepped away but I don't get the impression that high profile and administration heavy communication would be a role which would appeal to him, although I may be wrong. Someone needs to step up, and very soon if a group is too survive and march cohesively and survive after the march.
  • Nobody has been bought off.....

    But something has gone on
  • Marchers should rally around WHUISA as they are the 'official' supporters club who are affiliated to the Football Supporters Federation. They are still negotiating with the authorities re the march going ahead.
  • IronHerb said:

    Marchers should rally around WHUISA as they are the 'official' supporters club who are affiliated to the Football Supporters Federation. They are still negotiating with the authorities re the march going ahead.

    Could they even be described as the real West Ham fans group?
  • http://www.whufc.com/news/articles/2018/march/03-march/club-offer-generous-donation-after-postponed-fixture

    A nice story: the U23s match was cancelled so they arranged for the unneeded food for the pre-match meal to go to a homeless charity.
Sign In or Register to comment.