I notice the club has started up that idiotic Mediawatch section on the website again. Today's section includes speculative content that undermines Bilic's position. Amateurish.
This article beggars belief. It must be skating very closely towards constructive dismissal IMO
I notice the club has started up that idiotic Mediawatch section on the website again. Today's section includes speculative content that undermines Bilic's position. Amateurish.
This article beggars belief. It must be skating very closely towards constructive dismissal IMO
I notice the club has started up that idiotic Mediawatch section on the website again. Today's section includes speculative content that undermines Bilic's position. Amateurish.
This article beggars belief. It must be skating very closely towards constructive dismissal IMO
Why on earth do they do it??..
Think you've answered your own question there.
?
Are you suggesting the club want Bilic to leave and to sue them for constructive dismissal?
Jinxed on kumb says Slav has a few hours left. Reckon Bilic will be sacked after the Arsenal game rather than before and give the new manager a baptism of fire against Arsenal
Southampton ( Poch and Koeman for example ) seem to be good at picking managers. Can't we just ask them a favour or sneakily find our who they'd target if Puel left.... ;wink ;thumbsup
But I'm glad they've said it. Six points more, at any cost, should see us safe. Then we can forget this horror show of a season and (cautiously) look forward to the next one.
Mrs G & NWC, it's interesting that you call the article rubbish or beyond rubbish as it contains similar views to ones quoted on here in the past. Transfer policy being poor during last summer, Payet being let down by the aforementioned transfers & the way the board treat their managers. As usual I must have missed something! ;whistle
Comments
£30m was offered and accepted but wasn't buying bats or bacca
Eur40m wasn't buying Lacazette
No top top drawer player player wanted to come even after our astonishing efforts of last season
Now whether this is because they didn't want West Ham or they didn't think Bilic was a big enough name to play for who knows??..
Why on earth do they do it??..
Doesn't explain why he's been at our last four home games?
Are you suggesting the club want Bilic to leave and to sue them for constructive dismissal?
Doesn't seem a plausible (conspiracy) theory to me.
(Also, I don't see much evidence that they undermine managers, but that's an aside to the main issue)
Interesting reading.
Another one to comment on, I hope.
http://www.whufc.com/news/articles/2017/april/02-april/statement-west-ham-united-board
#nudgenudgewinkwinksaynomore
;lol Good luck with that.
I'll be honest, I'm surprised.
But I'm glad they've said it. Six points more, at any cost, should see us safe. Then we can forget this horror show of a season and (cautiously) look forward to the next one.
Another horror show v arsenal and a failure v Swansea and he's gone.
Laughable that this is the same website that only a short while ago was publishing rumours about who we were targeting to replace him.
Information on same website, but hardly the same thing.
The ridiculous 'Mediawatch' simply repeats what is in the media; no different to what people do on here.
The statement from the board seems pretty unequivocal to me, and I'm glad they've done it.
Not sure what your point is.
We don't let users tell other users they are talking rubbish (even if that is what they think) whilst off the site is fair game.
Unless you can point to instances where MrsG or NWC expressed those views?