The UK is Out - New PM - and whither now for Article 50

1…6768707273…79

Comments

  • TheMadcapLaughsTheMadcapLaughs
    Mrs g I agree they are not alternatives, I have said that whatever choices we are given are normally two sides of the same coin. The choice between trump and Clinton is no choice at all. The choice between remain and brexit is probably in all reality no choice at all given the conservative nature of the world/country we live in. But being out of Europe gives us a chance at doing things differently that otherwise we would never have within Europe. I am being extremely optimistic in my outlook here, I am hoping that we can show the world that there is a different way of doing things. Teresa may has at least acknowledged that there are problems and I'm hoping that the beastly politicians may at last come to their senses and work for the good of all. After the second world war there was a concerted effort to address inequality, we have lost our way in recent years but I'm hoping we in the UK can get back a bit of that social awareness. The eu despite some noble gestures is too big to address local issues. Centralisation fails under whatever guise.
  • HammerexHammerex
    My Dad always said, never argue about politics, or religion, and i think he was
    right. lets stick to Football, much more interesting.
    coyi
  • TheMadcapLaughsTheMadcapLaughs
    Thanks for the tune Mrs G, unfortunately I haven`t got speakers on my computer. Yes I`m a Luddite. My mobile also still has buttons and no touchscreen. Hammerex, your Dad was a wise man.
  • AdMeus_CaputFiliusAdMeus_CaputFilius
    IM44,

    Regarding your comments about the construction industry and Eastern European workers - I too work extensively in the Construction Industry and can say I have seen the same thing. Even to the extent that some of them have 'questionable' qualifications and experience, I have actually raise sanctions on some sites as it was clear that the workers did not understand the information that had been given to them (as they did not understand either verbal or written English or the language provided by interpretation - as supplied and paid for by the Company based on the information provided by agencies), but this also includes some from Asian countries.

    This includes some where I have witnessed the person being inducted being told which box of the multiple choice questions to tick (so I had the interpreter and the agency supervisor taken off site as well), and also where it was clear, one operative who was trained and skilled instructing his unskilled/unqualified friend what to do - who was supposedly to have had five years experience.

    However, my opinion is that the industry has bought it on itself, rather than maintain a well trained pool of UK professionals and bringing in new blood to keep it, supplemented with overseas workers where needed, they decided to save themselves all those training costs (not to mention redundancy payments or retention costs when time were lean) and just hire in from the overseas agencies, getting workers already qualified at a lower costs (wage) - so basically they let greed get the better of them.
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    edited December 2016
    The Suprem Court is in the 2nd day of hearing the Govt. appeal against the previous high court ruling that Article 50 can't be triggered without a parliamentary vote.

    Some of the legal stuff is a bit ;puzzled for a non-specialist, but I am finding it very interesting.

    Not least this, which is what the then govt Minister for Europe said in the House of Commons. (he was referring to a request to amend the bill to specify various % etc)

    ref

    So whatever they printed on their leaflets, the govt knew, and Parliament knew, that the referendum vote was not binding by law. Even if the govt said they would act as if it was. It has only advisory status. As has been pointed out many times.
  • PrestonHammerPrestonHammer
    I think politicians are between a rock and a hard place. The government never thought in a million years that the majority would vote to leave. Now that they have they have, they have a choice between leaving the EU and not knowing what the future will be or deciding not to follow through with the wishes of half the people who voted and risk people not bothering to vote again because politicians can't be trusted.
  • NEoldironNEoldiron
    edited December 2016
    MrsGrey, I'm afraid you're banging your head against a brick wall.
    The country is being railroaded into a situation that has its source in party politics ie. Cameron trying to appease his anti-EU MPs.
    The country took the chance to give politicians a kicking heedless of the consequences that will soon be upon us and regardless that it's not the EU that deserves the anger, but the UK government - the EU was just a convenient target.
  • Expat_HammerExpat_Hammer
    edited December 2016
    NEoldiron said:


    The country took the chance to give politicians a kicking heedless of the consequences that will soon be upon us and regardless that it's not the EU that deserves the anger, but the UK government - the EU was just a convenient target.

    Oh, so now it's all about kicking the politicians is it. Of course it is, nobody who voted "Leave" ever thought of anything else did they. No, we're all thicko bigots*, as has been said on here before about leave votors.

    NE, please try to comprehend the possibility that people actually wanted to leave the EU rather than upset the politicians. Can you not accept that people genuinely want to leave the EU for their own valid reasons rather than merely taking the opportunity to knock them damned politicians. That they actually thought about what may happen before voting.

    * Racist and Xenophobic options were available during our BOGOF offer which unfortunately ended on the 3rd December
  • claretandblueskyclaretandbluesky
    That NEold is about as succinctly as it can be put. Tory party politics created this mess by calling a referendum on a subject not fit for referendum, parts of the nation have genuine grievance with how things are at present and chose to kick when invited, the Tory party had once again caused these problems with misdirected austerity measures and yet the EU got kicked for it, and now the Tory party seek to survive at all costs through brexit means brexit. In my view the Tory party has been worse for this country since Margaret Thatcher onwards than the EU has ever been.
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    My own view is that people voted to leave (and remain for that matter) for different reasons, and it's not possible to ascribe the same motives/grounds to all (on either side).

    Expat, I have sympathy that since the beginning of this whole process, you feel you are being lumped in with others whose views and motives you don't share.


    Nevertheless, some who voted leave are bigots and racists. I don't see any point if trying to pretend that isn't the case. I also don't think it is possible to deny - since many who were interviewed publicly during and after the referendum were explicit about it - that some voted leave for no other reason than to put 2 fingers up at 'the establishment' as they saw it.

  • Expat_HammerExpat_Hammer
    edited December 2016
    Mrs G, I both accept and respect all of the points you have made above.

    The fact that you have made them in an eloquent manner totally acceptable to me is greatly appreciated ;hug

    and I shall of course refresh your ;redwine in the BA at your leisure
    ............... but only 1 mind, I know what you're like once you get started ;lol

  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    NE, I think it is interesting in that opinion piece you linked to, in amongst all the examples of racist attacks, is this statistic: Polling shows, for example, that 77% of leave voters believe EU migrants already living here should remain.

    That's a big number, and bears out my opinion above, which I could probably paraphrase as Not all Leavers are racist but all racists are Leavers.

    I don't think it helps the debate not to acknowledge that.

  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    Expat_Hammer said:



    and I shall of course refresh your ;redwine in the BA at your leisure
    ............... but only 1 mind, I know what you're like once you get started ;lol

    Too late, mate ;lol

    ;redwine ;redwine
  • Expat_HammerExpat_Hammer
    edited December 2016
    Just as well I got paid then ;weep

    but ......................... don't tell Suze I've topped you up ;run

    ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine ;redwine

    ;biggrin
  • grey_til_I_dyegrey_til_I_dye
    Expat

    I'm not sure any post on here has suggested that all leave voters were racist/bigoted/unintelligent/ill-informed.

    From interviews and reactions, however, it is clear that some at least are.

    I don't think it is useful for people on either side of the debate to issue 'all you lot' comments, or to ascribe their own motivations to the majority of those who voted in the same way.
  • Expat_HammerExpat_Hammer
    Well you're not getting a ;redwine then .................... ;lol
  • grey_til_I_dyegrey_til_I_dye
    Luckily, I have ;beer ;biggrin
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    edited December 2016
    Up until the point where I hid it. ;run
  • claretandblueskyclaretandbluesky
    Things starting to clarify a little as TM appears to recognise she is not winning the legal argument taking place at present and agrees to offer an outline plan.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38224169

    The EU make clear their negotiation position, that membership comes with benefits and it is not possible to retain those benefits without membership. This means one way or another you pay for the privilege of trade, through membership or lump sums and acknowledgments. I think it is clear that TM does not need push for a hard brexit as she will get one from the EU anyway.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38221140

    If this was a poker game I know whose hand I would like to have.

    It will be strange to watch this play out as very few deals end in a lose lose situation, most result in at least one party winning or both, at present however this looks likely to be a lose lose, if so it will demonstrate the power of politics for you and how not to take it lightly........... looking at you David Cameron.
  • PrestonHammerPrestonHammer
    I blame the MP's as well. They voted 6-1 in favour of having a referendum. If they thought for one second that Leave would win, I don't think they would have voted for the referendum full stop.
  • claretandblueskyclaretandbluesky
    Totally agree Preston - not one, even those wanting to leave at the time would have imagined in their wildest dreams that leave would win.
  • SwissironSwissiron
    Rule by referendum and rule by parliamentary government are not compatible, that's what everything is about.......


    ............It's also why we can't find a fit 20+ goal a season striker, so there you have it....
  • claretandblueskyclaretandbluesky
    Interesting angle regarding exactly what the line about falling back to WTO rules entails.

    http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/12/06/very-quietly-liam-fox-admits-the-brexit-lie
  • simoncsimonc
    MrsGrey said:

    Not all Leavers are racist but all racists are Leavers.

    I don't think it helps the debate not to acknowledge that.

    This is the sort of statement that is driving a wedge right through Europe and the USA - for starters racists come in all colors and nationalities, people on both sides hold bigoted and or racist views so no i for one do not accept that "ONLY" out votors are racist
  • grey_til_I_dyegrey_til_I_dye
    I can't think why someone with stated racist views would choose to remain in the EU, especially given the focus on immigration control in the run-up to the vote.
  • TheMadcapLaughsTheMadcapLaughs
    edited December 2016
    The phrase "not all that voted leave are racists but all racists voted leave" is an overstatemnt. There are out and out racists and far right groups who to a man probably voted leave, they may well be covered in tattoos, have shaven heads and wear bovver boots. They are open and plain in their views. However, there are plenty of Tristans, Jeremies and Charlies who work in the city, there are plenty of Mabels and Margarets who do sterling work for the church, there are loads of Anabelles, Camillas, and Henriettas, ladies who lunch but do little else, and amongst these fine upstanding people, many would have voted Remain, but amongst them there will be racists. They may not spit and snarl and hurl abuse, but they will gossip about the "dark" people who have moved onto "the close", chatter about the new "ethnic" shop selling funny smelling foods on the high street and titter at the "funny accents" now prevalent in Toby`s new school. There will be racists who voted both ways. Not all racists voted leave, plenty of twin set and pearl racists would have voted remain.
    C&B, I agree with you regarding The Tory party and our history since Thatcher, but austerity isn`t a UK problem/phenomenon, its a "western world" liberal free market/capitalist phenomena. Austerity and The EU go hand in hand. Countries within the western world are rejecting austerity and globalisation and looking inwards for answers. This would generally be considered to be a regressive/reactionary step, but one that in the present circumstances is perfectly understandable. People are basically saying to the politicians "sort whats on your own doorstep first". Not unreasonable really. THE EU and its core fundamental ideologies have caused this economic and social collapse and people across Europe are rejecting both the ideology and the resultant austerity measures. Austerity is not a UK problem, its a "western world" problem, and people, within their own democratic countries (when given the chance) are voting for an alternative, its very hard to vote out unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. The EU is nothing more or less than an economic/social experiment, sometimes experiments go wrong, the politicians within The EU have steadfastly refused to acknowledge or accept when things have/are going wrong and have/are ploughing on regardless with the blinkers on and their fingers in their ears. The EU will shake itself to pieces and we will hopefully be well clear when it happens.
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    edited December 2016
    However, there are plenty of Tristans, Jeremies and Charlies who work in the city, there are plenty of Mabels and Margarets who do sterling work for the church, there are loads of Anabelles, Camillas, and Henriettas, ladies who lunch but do little else,
    Interesting social stereotyping there, not to mention a fair bit of gender stereotyping too ;hmm
  • NEoldironNEoldiron
    edited December 2016
    Able Seaman Remain (Lookout) - "Captain,Captain, there's an iceberg ahead"
    Captain May- "Never you mind son, it'll move over for us. We're on the SS UK, unsinkable, don't you know"
    AB Remain - "Captain, please"
    Captain May - "Don't worry, stay calm, besides what would I tell the passengers if we changed course just for a silly iceberg"
    ;weep
  • MrsGreyMrsGrey
    edited December 2016
    Madcap, austerity isn't a problem, it's a solution that was chosen (by some governments) to a perceived problem (of a budget deficit).

    The budget deficit 'crisis' was a consequence of the global financial collapse.

    The EU didn't cause the 'problem'. Nor did it require that member states choose the austerity solution.

    That choice was purely down to the ideology (as reflected in their economic policy) of the elected governments in each case ... and the buck ultimately stops at the electorate for voting for those policies.

    If people wanted to vote for an alternative, they shouldn't have elected the Tory government. Twice. With a bigger majority the 2nd time.

    If the EU was the cause of austerity, then leaving it would end austerity. Yeah, right.



  • claretandblueskyclaretandbluesky
    Housing problems due to Thatcher selling of council houses and not replacing them, dismantling industry which whole communities relied upon without replacing them and austerity budgets reducing services at a time the services needed supporting and building due to immigration, all of these were pressures upon communities that had built and contributed quite heavily in my opinion to leave areas rejecting the EU but had only their roots in Tory decisions and policy, the EU had not any hand in this. They could be seen as advocators of austerity as they had insisted upon it in countries they had bailed out, but here in the UK it was all all our own work. As Mrs Grey points out we had a chance to vote them out but gave them a bigger majority instead and they are somehow having the working class behind them now cheering old TM on as the deliverer of their brexit. Not even Paul Daniels could have pulled that trick off.
This discussion has been closed.