The UK is Out - New PM - and whither now for Article 50

1545557596079

Comments

  • edited November 2016
    Claret and Blue, I can see what you are saying and to a point I agree. However my vote was cast with the understanding that things would most likely get worse before they then hopefully get better.

    What has been frustrating for people that voted out is that those that voted remain seem set on proving just how bad everything is in the hope that it will change those that voted to leaves mind. By remainers trying to prove the negatives they are possibly adding to the issues, without yet waiting to see what exit deal we can secure.

    From my own personal point of view I would accept things getting a lot worse yet. FTSE 100 goes down, this doesn't really affect me day to day.
    Sterling goes down, a few things get a bit more expensive but on the whole my day to day life doesn't change.
    GDP goes down (it is actually up) oh well, these are just numbers on a chart to the average person who voted.
    Unemployment goes up, this one I admit would be bad and I hope doesn't happen and hasn't happened yet.

    Most people feel so detached about government figures, but what they can see is how their own local area is changing, and if it is for the worse then I can understand them wanting to change that.
  • I agree Tomw, the money figures wont worry too many, it's unemployment, interest rates and inflation that matter to most of us. Like you I couldn't really care less about the FTSE but I have a job, which I need keep, a mortgage which I need be able to afford and shopping I need pay for, so if these things rise that matters a lot.

    One of the most damaging things about close call referendum is the divisive nature of it, as seen in the Scottish Independence vote also, this division I feel makes people dig in far deeper than is rational for their chosen side. I recall Boris the day after the vote making the point that it was close and an awful lot of people also voted to stay, were that the tone and narrative continued with it may have been more helpful, sadly Theresa has played to the home crowd and had a go at anyone who wants to bring the referendum and it's consequences into question, something there are many grounds to do in my view. All of this sets a divisive tone and so both sides dig in, the leavers want to claim victory at all costs quite possibly, whilst the remainers revel in their more immediately pragmatic and intellectual prognosis to be proven correct, sometimes at all costs. On this point I have spoken to leavers who would willingly sacrifice everything to get their win, and remainers who would happily see the nation taken back to the 70's to be able to say I told you so...... usually the thing found in common between these two people is nothing to lose, either they are insulated from it through wealth, or have nothing anyway and so if everyone has nothing what does it matter also. Sadly we can be sure that the politicians will mostly fall into the former of these two categories.

    My hope is that in or out we retain enough pragmatism to put the national interest first, if we can get a deal that works, that could make it a good move then have a go, but if it is blatantly clear we cannot, that the nation will be set back by such a move, that we have the courage to re-consider our course and not act like it is set in stone and that democracy ended in June, and that that vote will forever trump all conditions no matter how they evolve.
  • Claretandblue, the last paragraph ;clap ;clap ;clap
  • C&B, again I find myself agreeing with a lot of what you have said, even though we fall into the opposite sides on this. Although I think that what Teresa May is trying to do is strengthen our starting position for the negotiations that are to come with the EU. I feel that we are in a bit of a catch 22 at the moment with the vocal minority of both sides of the vote doing their best to push their cause.

    If both remainers and leavers all looked to approach it together then there may be less of the digging it trying to prove one side right or wrong, which in my opinion is impossible to do as we will never be able to compare what would have happened to what is now going to happen.

    I would like to see more of the approach that Boris outlined after the vote, as I consider myself as a moderate leave voter and also fully appreciate that there were 48% of people that wanted to stay that we need to reconnect with too. However remainers were quick to jump on that saying that the leavers are trying to go back on their word so the hard stance was adopted by Teresa May.

    I would be the first to say that we may need to re evaluate if things really do get bad, however I do not believe that will happen as we are a major economy and there is a whole wide world out there that we can trade with. Also worst case we need to pay tariffs for access to the EU market, reports state that will make us 12b from the EU and cost us 6b so a net gain.

    My fear is that remainers will do their best to see the country fail and that leavers will accept that to get the victory they think they won. What I think will happen though is that a middle ground will be found (and there will need to be compromises on both sides) and that actually we can make it work and still have a successful country and economy.

  • Not sure about a second referendum. You can't vote to leave then hold a new vote based on what is negotiated. The moment the EU hear about a possible second referendum they just drop all negotiating and say nope, you throw away your bargaining power from the off.

    Otherwise why not have an EU referendum every 5 years if the EU does not change what so ever.
  • Not sure you can trigger article 50, then later decide (for whatever reason referendum, change of govt with different mandate, whatever) to not leave.

    I don't think there's any mechanism to 'untrigger' as it were.
  • Completely deny you ever triggered it and blame any confusion on the Daily Mail misquoting you.
  • I like the cut of your jib ;thumbsup


    Alternatively, say it was a sting operation. #entrapment
  • Voted for Amexit today - Trump ;ok
  • simonc said:

    Voted for Amexit today - Trump ;ok

    I respect your vote, but I cannot support it - I am not a fan of Shrillery but IMO, Trump simply does not have the temperament to be President of the United States and the weight of responsibility that goes with the office.
  • Chicago, I understand your concerns but like Brexit it is a now or never situation Hillary will double down on all of Obamas failed policies and fill her pockets while doing so. Trump built a business empire & raised some very well balanced children in the process. What he has done in spite of the media & even some republican opposition is quite amazing, this is a movement against the political entitled. Its time for a reset in the USA, Trump may not have been many peoples first choice but he is the only one who can do it now so he gets my vote.
  • GO Cubs! ;wahoo
  • Now that is something that we can agree on - GO CUBS GO!!!! Tomorrow night is going to be crazy
  • With a nod to Ian Dury, "Reasons to be cheerful"
    :
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37838087


    ..........not. ;whistle
  • Can't even understand why you would back Trump. Guy is a total nut job.
  • The same could also be said of B LIAR but enough people did ;weep
  • Expat

    Not in the same league, not even close.
  • NE, the chap said "while we expect this to be only a temporary phenomenon........

    "The last time CPI inflation hit 4% was in 2011.....

    And the reason for that was.........erm...................was erm......................

    Prices go up and down, markets go up and down, currencies go up and down. This happens Brexit or no Brexit. Everyone expected economic volatility, there will be economic volatility, we are just about clawing our selves out of one of the longest, deepest World recessions, what caused that, Brexit????? Remainers can point to countless charts, diagrams and statistics both pre and post the Brexit vote and it PROVES nothing. Yeold was absolutely gutted at the Brexit result, but as he says above, do we have a vote every time the markets wobble, every time things look a little uncomfortable? One major cause of economic instability is uncertainty, not until May triggers article 50, not until the UK, the EU and the rest of the World have hammered out their deals (protected the very wealthiest) will graphs and pie charts mean diddly squat. This will take years.










  • It will take years, and we have stepped forward as the test case to see what happens when a someone leaves, do they flourish? stabilise in a similar place? or fall and become a shadow of its former self? I am not sure it was a strategically good move to step forward for that one considering our position of strength. I actually thought Greece would be the first to leave sometime back but they chose to remain despite the massive pressures on them which could potentially have been reduced by leaving the Euro and EU. They had a big incentive to possibly take a course of short to mid term pain for long term benefit, but even if they had theoretically taken that leap the position they could have hoped to find themselves in in ten - fifteen years time would not have looked as good as the position we leapt from, our gamble seems to be can we leave and have it not cause us to collapse, as the potential gain I am not sure is too clear.
  • I think Greece was possibly too broken, too weak and too reliant on Eu bailouts. Stuck between a rock and a hard place. And I don`t think we will collapse, I can`t think for the life of me why we would. What we need to do is stop talking ourselves down and "get on with it". We desperately need to start making things again, and not necessarily for export, but for us. Not protectionist, not inward looking, but common sense. And I know everyone is banging on about trade and trade deals, but these long drawn out negotiations taken by nameless, faceless bureaucrats, who are they designed ultimately to benefit, us?? or the large multinationals looking for the next market ripe for exploitation? International trade has undoubtedly improved the lives and conditions of thousands of people, but there is always losers, always. Large multinationals are not looking to improve the lives of "ordinary people," they are looking to maximise profits, at whatever cost, human and/or environmental. Free trade and trade deals are designed not with you and me in mind, but for the benefit of big business, big business will look to maximise profit from cheap labour and cheap raw materials, trade deals are arranged to make it easier for big business. The World needs to step back from globalization, the greater centralization of power, take a breath and think again. Small and local is the way to go.
  • I think small and local is definitely the way we are headed at present.
  • Where's your Dunkirk spirit?
  • I think Greece was possibly too broken, too weak and too reliant on Eu bailouts. Stuck between a rock and a hard place. And I don`t think we will collapse, I can`t think for the life of me why we would. What we need to do is stop talking ourselves down and "get on with it". We desperately need to start making things again, and not necessarily for export, but for us. Not protectionist, not inward looking, but common sense. And I know everyone is banging on about trade and trade deals, but these long drawn out negotiations taken by nameless, faceless bureaucrats, who are they designed ultimately to benefit, us?? or the large multinationals looking for the next market ripe for exploitation? International trade has undoubtedly improved the lives and conditions of thousands of people, but there is always losers, always. Large multinationals are not looking to improve the lives of "ordinary people," they are looking to maximise profits, at whatever cost, human and/or environmental. Free trade and trade deals are designed not with you and me in mind, but for the benefit of big business, big business will look to maximise profit from cheap labour and cheap raw materials, trade deals are arranged to make it easier for big business. The World needs to step back from globalization, the greater centralization of power, take a breath and think again. Small and local is the way to go.

    The concept of local doesn't work anymore. The reason why local butchers / pubs / groceries all close down is because Supermarkets offer cheaper goods in a capitalist society, you can argue all day long about the quality of the product but the large majority of people want cheap food to get them by. If people spend lavishly they do it at a restaurant where the food is cooked for them than having to buy through the roof from a butchers to do it yourself.
    Its a whole lot harder in this day and age to do anything local, we are in a global economy whether you believe it or not. Made in China labelled everywhere and for a reason they produce it cheap and export it and unless the UK is prepared to lower living standards to that of China to compete there is very little that the UK or anyone else will produce that the Chinese cannot do cheaper and for a fraction of the cost.

    Its one of the biggest reasons i voted to remain in the EU because by god do i think the Conservatives wish they could turn the average workers, working conditions into that of China's pittance pay, pittance working conditions.
  • Small boats?
  • Those same conservatives that have raised the minimum wage, are talking about a living wage and have also confirmed that they will safeguard all holiday/sick pay that we currently get as well as looking to improve maternity pay.

    Workers have never had it so good, especially with H&S standards now too. Any government that tries to go back on these minimum standards know they would be booted out straight away.

    Also the referendum was not about party politics but a bigger issue of EU politics. If you don't like what the government does here you can vote against them.
  • edited November 2016
    Tomw85 said:



    Workers have never had it so good,

    ;nonono No way I can agree with this, at all.

    Unions all but powerless, pension age getting ever higher, zero-hours contracts on the rise, 'gig' economy, unpaid internships masquerading as training, workers in small businesses not benefiting from the same protections as those in large businesses..

    I could go on.

    All of these are making things worse for workers, not better.
  • Tomw85 said:

    Those same conservatives that have raised the minimum wage, are talking about a living wage and have also confirmed that they will safeguard all holiday/sick pay that we currently get as well as looking to improve maternity pay.

    Workers have never had it so good, especially with H&S standards now too. Any government that tries to go back on these minimum standards know they would be booted out straight away.

    Also the referendum was not about party politics but a bigger issue of EU politics. If you don't like what the government does here you can vote against them.

    If you believe everything they say ok but NO WAY would i trust them
  • With the ever-increasing numbers on zero-hours contracts, fewer and fewer people are entitled to sick pay. So I doubt that promise will comfort them much.

    And have they committed to increases over time, or will we see it frozen at current levels ad infinitum? I know which one I would bet on.

    As for maternity pay, a similar point applies. And while the payments may remain at the same level, I wonder if all those currently entitled will remain entitled? ;hmm
  • edited November 2016
    Tom, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you mention some time ago that you were an estate agent?
  • I think Greece was possibly too broken, too weak and too reliant on Eu bailouts. Stuck between a rock and a hard place. And I don`t think we will collapse, I can`t think for the life of me why we would. What we need to do is stop talking ourselves down and "get on with it". We desperately need to start making things again, and not necessarily for export, but for us. Not protectionist, not inward looking, but common sense. And I know everyone is banging on about trade and trade deals, but these long drawn out negotiations taken by nameless, faceless bureaucrats, who are they designed ultimately to benefit, us?? or the large multinationals looking for the next market ripe for exploitation? International trade has undoubtedly improved the lives and conditions of thousands of people, but there is always losers, always. Large multinationals are not looking to improve the lives of "ordinary people," they are looking to maximise profits, at whatever cost, human and/or environmental. Free trade and trade deals are designed not with you and me in mind, but for the benefit of big business, big business will look to maximise profit from cheap labour and cheap raw materials, trade deals are arranged to make it easier for big business. The World needs to step back from globalization, the greater centralization of power, take a breath and think again. Small and local is the way to go.

    The concept of local doesn't work anymore. The reason why local butchers / pubs / groceries all close down is because Supermarkets offer cheaper goods in a capitalist society, you can argue all day long about the quality of the product but the large majority of people want cheap food to get them by. If people spend lavishly they do it at a restaurant where the food is cooked for them than having to buy through the roof from a butchers to do it yourself.
    Its a whole lot harder in this day and age to do anything local, we are in a global economy whether you believe it or not. Made in China labelled everywhere and for a reason they produce it cheap and export it and unless the UK is prepared to lower living standards to that of China to compete there is very little that the UK or anyone else will produce that the Chinese cannot do cheaper and for a fraction of the cost.

    Its one of the biggest reasons i voted to remain in the EU because by god do i think the Conservatives wish they could turn the average workers, working conditions into that of China's pittance pay, pittance working conditions.
    Yeold, you have explained what has happened the past 30 years and for me it quite plainly isn't working. Just because it is what has happened doesn't make it right. Surely having local shops selling local produce is better isn't it? NE said he used to install machines made in England and was proud of the fact, why did we stop making them? Surely "stuff" made and produced locally is better for the planet in the long run. And I agree, the conservatives, capitalists, will always try to lower the cost of production, I.E. labour, this is why Thatcher wanted to smash the unions, it gives them a free ride. I certainly don't want wages and conditions driven down, remaining in the EU can only perpetuate the system that seeks to maintain the status quo, and yes we currently have the tories in charge, but as an independent country surely we have a greater chance of eventually doing things right. The EU currently is an old boys club that is getting bigger and more powerful and I`m not comfortable with that. I think the way forward is for countries, counties, cities, towns to aim towards (as far as is practicably possible) being more self sufficient. It needs a reset, in needs people to forget about their next smartphone, forget about the designer handbag and maybe look at the bigger picture. As part of the EU we have no chance of influencing our own lives, as an independent country we have half a chance. As I`ve said from the start, for me getting out of the EU is a small step, getting rid of the remaining tiers of government would be the ideal. Assuming you can get yourself out of bed in the morning, get yourself washed, dressed and suitably nourished I`m sure that you`ll be alright Yeold, have a bit of self confidence, confidence in your fellow "ordinary people", we can survive without the politicians and bureaucrats you know, we will survive out of the EU.
This discussion has been closed.